A benchmark is a reference point that lets you evaluate your portfolio in context rather than in isolation. Without a benchmark, a 12% annual return sounds excellent — until you discover the market returned 28%. With a benchmark, you have the context to make that judgment. Here is how to use them effectively.
A benchmark is a standard portfolio or market index against which your portfolio is compared. Benchmarks serve two functions: they tell you whether your returns are competitive (performance benchmarking) and they tell you whether your risk level is appropriate for your goals (allocation benchmarking). Our tool focuses on allocation benchmarking — comparing your risk score and asset mix against three standard reference portfolios.
| Benchmark | Allocation | Risk Level | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60/40 Classic | 60% stocks, 40% bonds, 0% ETFs | Medium | Moderate-risk investors, 40s–50s, traditional balanced approach |
| S&P 500 ETF | 0% stocks, 0% bonds, 100% ETFs | High | Long-horizon growth investors comfortable with full market volatility |
| Conservative | 20% stocks, 70% bonds, 10% ETFs | Low | Pre-retirement, capital preservation, short time horizon |
Your portfolio appears as a fourth row in the comparison table, highlighted. This lets you see immediately whether your risk score and volatility estimate are above or below each benchmark — giving you an instant read on where you sit on the spectrum.
The benchmark table shows five data points for each portfolio: the allocation (stocks/bonds/ETFs percentages), the risk level (Low/Medium/High), the risk score (0–100%), and the estimated volatility range (annual percentage swing). Here is what each tells you:
The benchmark comparison is a diagnostic, not a directive. Finding that your portfolio is higher-risk than the 60/40 is not automatically a problem — it may be entirely appropriate for your age and goal. The comparison tells you where you sit; your goal and time horizon tell you whether that position is right.
The most useful question to ask when reviewing the comparison: does my risk level match my stated goal? If your goal is retirement savings 20 years away and your risk score is significantly below the 60/40, you may be leaving growth on the table. If your goal is short-term savings for a home purchase in 2 years and your score is above the S&P 500 ETF benchmark, you are taking substantially more risk than the goal warrants.
Of the three benchmarks, the 60/40 is the most practically useful for most investors. It is the most widely referenced moderate-risk allocation in finance. Decades of research have characterised its behaviour across multiple market cycles. Financial advisers, academic literature, and retirement planning tools all reference it. Knowing whether your portfolio is above or below the 60/40 on the risk scale gives you a shared reference point for conversations with advisers and for evaluating your own risk positioning over time.
Our tool uses three standard allocation benchmarks. For performance comparison — evaluating whether your returns are competitive — the most commonly used market indices are the S&P 500 (US large-cap equities), the MSCI World Index (global equities), and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (US investment-grade bonds). Most brokerage platforms show your portfolio performance against at least one of these indices automatically.
One important note on performance benchmarks: comparing your returns against an equity index when your portfolio holds significant bonds is misleading. A 60/40 portfolio should be benchmarked against a 60/40 index, not against the S&P 500 alone. Comparing against a pure equity index makes your balanced portfolio look like it is underperforming, when it may be delivering exactly the risk-adjusted returns it should.
Run your benchmark comparison now — free, private, takes 60 seconds.
Compare My Portfolio →