Your investment portfolio should look materially different at 25 than at 55. Age is not the only variable — income, debt, dependants, and other assets all matter — but it shapes your time horizon, which is the single biggest determinant of how much risk your portfolio should carry. Here is the full picture by life stage.
Time horizon is the fundamental variable in investment risk management. A long time horizon means you can absorb short-term volatility and recover from drawdowns before you need to access the money. A short time horizon means a significant portfolio decline at the wrong moment directly impairs your ability to fund your goals — whether that is retirement income, a home purchase, or education costs.
As you age, your time horizon shortens and the consequences of poor timing increase. A 25-year-old who experiences a 40% portfolio decline in year one has 40+ years for the portfolio to recover and compound. A 60-year-old who experiences the same decline in their first year of retirement may be forced to sell depleted assets to fund living expenses — a phenomenon known as sequence-of-returns risk that can permanently impair retirement outcomes.
Suggested allocation: 70–90% stocks and equity ETFs, 10–30% bonds
Target risk score: 60–80%
The most important financial decision in your 20s is not your stock/bond split — it is whether you are investing at all. Getting money into the market early and consistently matters far more than optimising the allocation. Compounding over 40 years is extraordinarily powerful: $10,000 invested at age 25, growing at 8% annually, becomes $217,000 by age 65. The same $10,000 invested at 35 becomes $100,000. The decade of delay costs more than the next 30 years of optimisation will recover.
With that foundation: a high-equity allocation makes strong sense in your 20s. You have the longest time horizon of your investing life and can absorb multiple market cycles before needing the money. Build your emergency fund first (3 months in cash), then invest the rest aggressively in low-cost broad market ETFs.
Suggested allocation: 65–80% stocks and equity ETFs, 20–35% bonds
Target risk score: 55–70%
The 30s often bring competing financial priorities: mortgage payments, childcare costs, career transitions, and the first serious accumulation of investable wealth. The key risk management shift in this decade is ensuring your investment portfolio risk is calibrated against your full financial picture, not just the portfolio itself.
If you have a large mortgage, you already carry significant leveraged exposure to a single illiquid asset. Add to that equity-heavy investment portfolio and your total financial risk exposure is higher than your portfolio risk score alone suggests. Begin building your bond allocation more deliberately in your 30s — not because equities are less appropriate at this age, but because your overall risk exposure beyond the portfolio is increasing.
Suggested allocation: 55–70% stocks and equity ETFs, 30–45% bonds
Target risk score: 45–65%
The 40s are typically peak earning years and the decade when retirement transitions from abstract to concrete. With 20–25 years to retirement, equities remain appropriate as the majority of the portfolio — but the bond ballast becomes increasingly important as the portfolio grows in absolute size.
A 30% drawdown on a $50,000 portfolio is $15,000. The same percentage on a $400,000 portfolio is $120,000 — a materially different emotional and practical impact. As the portfolio grows, the case for maintaining a meaningful bond allocation strengthens even if the percentage might look conservative on paper. Begin formal rebalancing discipline in your 40s if you have not already.
Suggested allocation: 40–60% stocks and equity ETFs, 40–60% bonds
Target risk score: 35–55%
Sequence-of-returns risk is the central risk management challenge of the pre-retirement decade. If you retire or begin withdrawing from your portfolio immediately following a significant market decline, you are selling depreciated assets to fund living expenses, leaving less capital to participate in the eventual recovery. This sequencing — not the average return over your retirement — determines whether your money lasts.
The practical implication: de-risk the portfolio as you approach retirement, not because stocks will underperform, but because a major decline in the 5 years before or after retirement has a disproportionate impact on outcomes compared to the same decline at age 35. Shift toward a 50/50 or more conservative allocation through your 50s. Move bonds toward shorter duration to reduce rate sensitivity.
Suggested allocation: 30–50% stocks and equity ETFs, 50–70% bonds and cash
Target risk score: 20–40%
Retirement portfolios face a challenge that working-age portfolios do not: the withdrawal rate. Taking 4% per year from a portfolio means you need it to return at least 4% after inflation to avoid depletion. A portfolio that is too conservative may fail to keep pace with inflation and run out of money. A portfolio that is too aggressive may experience a large drawdown at the wrong moment and force selling at the bottom.
The solution most financial planners use is a bucket approach: keep 1–2 years of living expenses in cash, 3–5 years in short-duration bonds, and the remainder in equities. The cash and bond buckets fund near-term withdrawals without touching equities during downturns, while the equity bucket continues to grow for the long-term portion of retirement.
Check your current risk score against the target for your age and goal.
Analyse My Portfolio →